Philippines, October 16, 2026: ArcRISE Consultants, an engineering, project management, and advisory firm, is now open for engagements across the Philippines.

ArcRISE was founded by Edward M. Solayao, a Professional Civil Engineer with more than 30 years of experience across the Philippines, Asia Pacific, and the Middle East. The firm was created to give investors, developers, and owners something that is hard to find: senior, independent engineering judgment, applied before capital is committed and carried through to delivery.

Why we started

Too many projects move forward on assumptions nobody has tested: that the site can be served, that approvals will follow, that the budget will hold. By the time those assumptions fail, the money is spent and the options are few. ArcRISE exists to ask the hard questions early, answer them honestly, and turn complex engineering and commercial issues into decisions clients can act on.

What we offer

• Engineering Services: feasibility and pre-engineering studies, design review and coordination, construction engineering support, testing and commissioning, and asset assessment.
• Project Management Services: planning, cost and schedule control, procurement and contract administration, quality, safety, and risk management, from planning through handover.
• Advisory Services: technical due diligence, independent project reviews, options assessment, owner's representation, and project recovery.

How we work

1. Clarify the decision, the outcome you want, your constraints, and the evidence available.
2. Frame the options with their dependencies and risks, in plain language.
3. Align the right disciplines and stakeholders, with agreed roles and decisions.
4. Support implementation with clear milestones and reporting through to handover.

Who we serve

Property developers and landowners, industrial and logistics investors, infrastructure and regional growth proponents, resources and heavy industry clients, and private equity, family offices, and strategic investors. Our work spans property and estates, industrial and logistics, infrastructure, energy and resources, water, and digital infrastructure.

What sets us apart

ArcRISE is founder-led, so senior experience is in the room, not handed off. We have worked on both sides of the table, as owner and as consultant, and we stay independent in our advice. Reliability, Integrity, Solutions, and Excellence guide every engagement.

“Good projects start with good questions. We built ArcRISE Consultants to ask them early, answer them with integrity, and help clients move forward with confidence.”

What to expect when you contact us

A first conversation is about your project and the decision in front of you. We will listen, ask the questions that matter, and tell you honestly whether and how we can help. If we are not the right fit, we will say so.

Get in touch

To discuss a project or request our capability statement, contact info@arcriseconsultants.com, call +63 32 4142837, or reach us on mobile at +63 917 5083925.

Where we work

We work with owners and investors across the Philippines, from Luzon to the Visayas and Mindanao, on projects ranging from land development and township planning to industrial facilities and infrastructure-linked developments. Wherever a project sits, the approach is the same: verify the facts, frame the decision, and keep the work moving.

About ArcRISE Consultants: Guided by integrity. Grounded in engineering. Built for progress.

This announcement is for general information.

Keep reading

Ask any project veteran where the money was really won or lost, and the answer is rarely the construction site. It is usually a meeting months earlier, when a site was chosen, a scope sketched, a budget penciled in, and approvals simply assumed.

Each of those assumptions is a bet. The earlier it is tested, the cheaper it is to be wrong.

Treat the first gate as a real decision

Opportunity screening is often a quick desktop exercise, a few maps and a hopeful spreadsheet. It should be a formal gate that ends with a clear call: proceed to due diligence, revise the concept, defer, or stop. The output is a short opportunity evaluation, or pre-feasibility note, that sorts every constraint into three groups:

• Fatal constraints can stop the project outright, such as no legal access or a use that cannot be approved.
• Manageable constraints need design, approval, or stakeholder action, such as a drainage outfall to be negotiated.
• Cost-sensitive constraints need early allowances, programmed contingency, and commercial negotiation, such as a utility upgrade.

Five questions to answer before design starts

1. Can we get in? Confirm legal and physical access, right-of-way, and the public road interface. A site with no secure access is not a site.
2. Is the use approvable? Check zoning and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and whether a locational clearance, variance, rezoning, or agricultural land conversion may be needed.
3. Where does the water go? Understand flood exposure, drainage paths, low points, and whether the outfall is legally, hydraulically, and physically available.
4. Can utilities be served? Test power, water, and wastewater against the business case, and get provider confirmation in writing.
5. What would make us stop? Agree your stop criteria up front, so a bad answer becomes a decision and not a surprise.

Draw the constraints map

A simple constraints map is one of the most valuable early documents. It shows the boundaries, access points, road interfaces, drainage paths, low points, easements, existing land uses, utility corridors, environmental constraints, and obvious constructability issues, all on one sheet. It becomes the reference for due diligence, feasibility, and every design decision that follows.

Why this matters

Unverified assumptions quietly become permanent commitments: the land price, the sales promises, the design criteria, the loan terms. A short, disciplined review at the start is among the best-value work on any project, because it replaces hope with evidence while changing course is still cheap.

A short example

Consider a developer who buys a promising parcel because the price is attractive and the frontage looks good. Only after design begins does the team learn that the nearest drainage outfall belongs to a neighboring owner and the access road is narrower than assumed. Two quick questions at the opportunity stage, about where the water goes and who owns the access, would have turned a costly redesign into a negotiated purchase price.

At ArcRISE Consultants, this is where we start: testing the bets before capital is committed.

General information only; this article is not professional advice. Please consult qualified professionals for your specific project.

Keep reading

A seller shows you a clean title, a good location, and a persuasive price per square meter. Everything looks right. Then, months later, the survey shows an encroachment, the flood line crosses your access road, and the utility provider says the nearest capacity is two kilometers away.

Land due diligence exists to find those problems before you own them. Test the land in six areas, and make the purchase conditional on the answers that matter most.

1. Does the paper match the ground?

Verify title, ownership, encumbrances, liens, and annotations. Then commission a relocation survey to compare the title with actual occupation. Look for overlaps, road-widening takings, easements, and boundary discrepancies. Surprises on paper are cheap; surprises on site are not.

2. Which protected strips apply?

Under the Water Code of the Philippines (PD 1067), the banks of rivers and streams and the shores of seas and lakes are subject to a public-use easement of 3 meters in urban areas, 20 meters in agricultural areas, and 40 meters in forest areas, where structures are not allowed. Those strips come out of your developable area and your yield.

3. Is the intended use allowed?

Confirm zoning, the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and locational clearance requirements. If the land is agricultural, find out early whether conversion is needed. It can be a long-lead approval that should shape your acquisition terms and your timeline.

4. How does water behave on the site?

Map flood exposure, low points, waterways, and the downstream outfall. HazardHunterPH can generate an indicative multi-hazard report for a location, and official assessments can be requested from agencies such as PHIVOLCS, PAGASA, and the Mines and Geosciences Bureau. Treat the first as a screen and the second, together with a site investigation, as evidence.

5. Can the site be served?

Check road access, power, water, and sewerage. Ask providers for written serviceability confirmation, because capacity and lead times often drive both cost and schedule. A verbal "should be okay" is not a commitment.

6. Who else has a stake?

Identify occupants, informal settlers, neighbors, barangay concerns, and any ancestral domain triggers before they surface as delays or disputes. Early, respectful engagement protects both the project and the community.

Make the acquisition conditional

Where risks remain, tie the purchase to conditions such as zoning confirmation, an acceptable outfall, utility serviceability, or legal consolidation of ownership. A good due diligence report states the constraints, the likely approval triggers, the required studies, and the commercial implications, with a clear recommendation.

Questions to put to the seller

• Are there any disputes, occupants, or claims on the property?
• Has the land ever flooded, and how high did the water rise?
• Are there known easements, rights-of-way, or boundary issues?
• Which utilities already reach the site, and in whose name are the connections?
• Has any study, survey, or approval been prepared before, and can we see it?

General information only; this article is not professional advice. Please consult qualified professionals for your specific project.

Keep reading

Land is more available. Growth is real. Costs can look attractive. It is no surprise that investors are looking beyond Metro Manila, from Luzon to the Visayas and Mindanao.

But a project that works in one city does not automatically work in another. These are the five things investors most often underestimate.

1. Local requirements vary

National rules set the baseline, but local government units may ask for more: barangay resolutions, consultation records, drainage or traffic endorsements, and utility-provider letters. Review times and practices also differ. A pre-application meeting with the LGU planning and engineering offices is one of the cheapest ways to avoid a surprise.

2. Utility capacity and lead times

Power, water, and wastewater availability can set the schedule. Upgrades take time and money, and the nearest capacity may not be near your site. Get written confirmation from providers before you rely on it in the business case, and ask about lead times, not just availability.

3. Access and road jurisdiction

Whether the frontage road is a national or local road determines who approves your connection and drainage tie-in. Look beyond the entrance: check road condition, haul routes for materials, bridges and weight limits, and construction access for the whole project, not just the final gate.

4. Weather and drainage

The Philippines is typhoon-prone, with roughly 20 tropical cyclones entering the Philippine area of responsibility in a typical year. Plan earthworks and erosion control around the wet season, and design drainage for the site's actual catchment and outfall. A good drainage concept in the dry season may fail in the first storm.

5. Land and community complexity

Boundary uncertainty, informal occupancy, ancestral domain screening, and community acceptance can affect approvals and implementation. Start stakeholder engagement early, keep a record of it, and treat communities as partners in the project's future.

A practical response

• Phase the development so capital follows verified progress.
• Use scenario-based planning for approval and utility delays.
• Appoint a senior reviewer who has worked across regions and understands local delivery conditions.
• Build local relationships with the LGU, utility providers, and the barangay before you need them.

Questions to ask a local partner

• Which approvals take longest here, and why?
• Who are the key stakeholders beyond the LGU, such as the barangay and utility providers?
• What are the typical wet-season constraints for construction?
• Where do materials and skilled labor come from, and at what lead time?

Good local answers will not remove every risk, but they will show you where to look first.

Each region has its own rhythm: its own approvals culture, its own supply chain, and its own weather. Learn that rhythm before committing capital, and the numbers in your model become far more reliable.

Regional projects reward investors who respect local conditions and verify them early. They punish those who assume.

General information only; this article is not professional advice. Please consult qualified professionals for your specific project.

Keep reading

Projects rarely fail on a single day. They drift. A decision slips, an approval is assumed, a number is revised quietly, and months later everyone asks how it came to this.

The good news is that drift leaves clues. Here are five to watch for, and how to respond.

1. Assumptions that never close

Every project starts with assumptions: that the outfall can take the flow, that utilities will arrive on time, that the site is clear. If the assumptions register keeps growing and nothing closes, risk is accumulating in the background.

2. Design runs ahead of approvals

Drawings can look complete while permits, land access, and utility confirmations are not. Many approvals depend on one another, for example locational clearance before development or building permits, and environmental clearance before a development permit. A missed prerequisite can stall the whole sequence.

3. Utility and outfall promises are verbal

If capacity or discharge rights rest on a phone call, they are not secured. Informal comfort tends to disappear exactly when the design is frozen and the money is committed.

4. Comments and changes pile up without owners

Open agency comments, unresolved design changes, and decisions that live only in meeting memory are signs of lost control. The same issue resurfaces three meetings later, and nobody remembers who agreed to what.

5. Contingency is spent before construction

If contingency is being used to cover design gaps, the project is paying for earlier shortcuts. By the time the site opens, the safety net is already gone.

The common thread

A five-minute health check

1. When did we last close an assumption with evidence?
2. Which approvals are still open, and what depends on them?
3. What utility or outfall commitments do we have in writing?
4. Who owns each open agency comment?
5. How much contingency is left, and what has it been used for?

If you cannot answer a question quickly, you have found the place to start.

None of these signs means a project is failing. They mean it needs attention now, while the options are still wide and the cost of correction is still low.

Healthy projects close risks with evidence and escalate anything that touches the critical path, safety, environmental compliance, approvals, cost, land access, or utilities. If you recognize two or more of these signs, an independent project health check can find the root causes, identify governance gaps, and propose practical recovery actions.

General information only; this article is not professional advice. Please consult qualified professionals for your specific project.

Keep reading

An owner says, "I need certainty." A consultant says, "I need a clear scope." Both are right, and both can walk away from the same meeting believing the other did not listen.

Owners and consultants look at the same project through different lenses. When those lenses are not understood on both sides, gaps open up in scope, cost, and accountability.

What owners worry about

• Capital exposure and cost certainty.
• Time to revenue, and the cost of delay.
• Approvals, risks, and decisions that ultimately fall to them.
• Whether advice is independent of any commercial interest.

What consultants worry about

• A clear scope, defined deliverables, and fair acceptance criteria.
• Access to information and timely decisions.
• Professional responsibility and liability for their output.

Where friction usually starts

1. Vague briefs. A thin scope invites assumptions that later become disputes.
2. Unclear interfaces. Work falls between consultants because no one owns the boundary, such as drainage and traffic, or utilities and environment.
3. Uncontrolled change. Changes accepted informally become cost and schedule surprises.
4. Reports that do not drive decisions. Studies arrive, but no one converts them into design and approval actions.

What a dual perspective brings

It makes briefs sharper because you know what the consultant needs in order to deliver well. It makes scopes more realistic because you know what each study can and cannot answer. It lets you translate between the boardroom and the technical team, and it helps challenge assumptions on both sides without losing the working relationship.

Independence still matters

Experience on both sides is useful only if advice stays independent. At ArcRISE Consultants, we hold to Integrity first: recommendations reflect the client's best interests, assumptions and next steps are made visible, and we tell clients what they need to hear, not only what they hope to hear.

Building a better working relationship

• Share the decision, not just the task. Tell consultants what the work is for.
• Agree interfaces early. Put them in writing, with names.
• Set a rhythm. Short regular reviews prevent long surprises.
• Handle change openly. Record every change, its reason, and its cost and schedule effect.

None of this removes healthy tension. It simply makes the tension productive, so that the project benefits from both points of view.

A quick example

Imagine an owner who asks for a drainage study and receives a long report with a flood level and no recommendation. The consultant did what was asked; the owner did not get what was needed. A sharper brief would have asked for finished floor levels, detention requirements, and the approval implications. Both sides understood their own job but not the other's, and that gap is where time and money are lost.

The best projects are not the ones where owners and consultants never disagree. They are the ones where both know exactly what the other needs.

General information only; this article is not professional advice. Please consult qualified professionals for your specific project.

Keep reading

Use this checklist before acquisition, concept freeze, or authorization to proceed with detailed design. For each item, record what you reviewed, who owns it, a risk rating of high, medium, or low, and whether it is open, pending, or closed.

1. Land and legal

• Title status, ownership, encumbrances, liens, annotations, and easements.
• Land consolidation requirements.
• Evidence: certified true copies of titles, tax declarations, lot plans, deed documents.

2. Boundary and survey

• Boundaries, monuments, area, overlaps, and road-widening effects.
• Differences between the title and actual occupation.
• Evidence: relocation and topographic survey, surveyor certification, benchmark schedule.

3. Zoning and land use

• Consistency with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and zoning ordinance.
• Whether locational clearance, variance, rezoning, or agricultural conversion applies.
• Evidence: zoning certification, zoning map, written LGU advice.

4. Environmental

• Protected areas, water bodies, mangroves, tree cutting, contamination, and sensitive neighbors.
• The likely environmental pathway (ECC or CNC) with DENR-EMB.
• Easement strips along rivers, streams, and shores: 3, 20, or 40 meters under the Water Code, depending on area type.

5. Flooding and drainage

• Flood exposure, drainage paths, catchments, low points, waterways, and outfall access.
• Evidence: flood and hazard maps, site photos, a hydrology note. HazardHunterPH gives indicative results; request official reports where needed.

6. Access and traffic

• Legal and physical access, right-of-way, road condition, and jurisdiction (national or local).
• Construction access and likely traffic impacts.

7. Utilities

• Power, water, wastewater, telecoms, fire water, drainage, and temporary construction services.
• Evidence: written provider confirmations and a demand estimate.

8. Social and stakeholders

• Occupants, informal settlers, neighbors, barangay issues, and indigenous peoples triggers.
• A stakeholder register and an engagement plan where needed.

How to run the checklist

1. Assign an owner for each category (legal, survey, planning, environmental, civil, traffic, utilities, stakeholders).
2. Record the evidence reviewed and rate the risk.
3. Update status until every critical item is closed, accepted, or escalated.
4. Bring in specialists, such as a surveyor, geotechnical engineer, hydrologist, or planner, wherever an item is rated high.

A simple rating system

• High: could stop the project or materially change cost, yield, or schedule. Resolve before committing.
• Medium: manageable with design, approval, or stakeholder action. Assign an owner and a date.
• Low: note it, monitor it, and move on.

At the end, summarize the results in one page: the fatal items, the cost-sensitive items, the studies still needed, and your recommendation to proceed, revise, defer, or stop.

Why evidence matters

A checklist is only as good as the evidence behind it. "Looks fine" is an opinion; a title copy, a survey plan, or a provider letter is evidence. Record where each answer came from, so the next person can check it and the decision can be defended later.

We can run this review for you and summarize the findings as clear go, revise, defer, or stop recommendations.

This guide is general and does not replace legal, environmental, or permitting advice. Requirements vary by LGU, agency, and project type, so verify current requirements before relying on them.

Keep reading

A weak brief produces a weak report, and a weak report produces an expensive surprise. A strong brief does the opposite: it tells consultants which decision your project needs, so their studies produce answers and not just documents. Use this list when drafting or reviewing a terms of reference.

1. Project context. Location, site area, intended use, land status, known constraints, target approvals, and objectives.
2. Available information. List all existing surveys, studies, titles, maps, and authority records, and be clear about their limits.
3. Survey scope. Topographic and boundary surveys, benchmarks, easements, utilities, drainage, and structures, with the datum and accuracy stated.
4. Geotechnical scope. Investigation locations, testing, groundwater, pavement inputs, earthworks suitability, and foundation implications.
5. Hydrology and drainage. Catchments, flood levels, runoff, detention, outfalls, and downstream effects.
6. Traffic and access. Access location, trip generation, internal circulation, and the road authority interface.
7. Utilities. Power, water, wastewater, fire water, and telecoms, with provider confirmation and lead times.
8. Environmental and social. Baseline studies and the likely environmental and consultation pathway.
9. Deliverables and acceptance. Reports, drawings, calculations, and datasets, with clear criteria for accepting them.
10. Reporting and reviews. Interim findings before final reports, review workshops, and professional sign-off.

Ask for decisions, not just data

Require every study to identify no-go areas, conditional development areas, key assumptions, residual risks, and the effect on approvals. A flood study that gives only a water level is data. One that tells you the finished floor level, the detention requirement, and the approval implication is a decision.

Check the interfaces

Name who owns each boundary between consultants, such as drainage and traffic, or utilities and environment, so nothing falls between scopes. Require each consultant to state what they need from the others, and by when.

Define what "accepted" means

Accept outputs only when they give usable design parameters, clearly stated limitations, and direct relevance to approvals or design decisions. Agree up front who reviews, how comments are handled, and what professional sign-off is required.

Common mistakes in briefs

• Describing the site but not the decision the study must support.
• Leaving out available information, so work is repeated.
• Omitting acceptance criteria, which invites disputes later.
• Expecting one consultant to cover another's interface.

A good brief reads like a conversation between people who both want the project to succeed: here is what we know, here is what we need, here is how we will judge the result.

Finally, build review time into the schedule. Consultants need workshops, owners need time to read, and agencies need time to respond. A brief that ignores review time quietly sets the project up to be late.

We are happy to review a draft brief before you issue it.

This guide is general and does not replace legal, environmental, or permitting advice. Requirements vary by LGU, agency, and project type, so verify current requirements before relying on them.

Keep reading

Two owners can build the same facility with the same budget and end up with very different experiences. The difference is often not the design. It is the delivery approach: who is responsible for what, when the price is fixed, and who carries the risk when things change.

There is no universally best option. These are the three most common approaches and the trade-offs behind each.

1. Traditional (design, then bid, then build)

• How it works: a designer completes the design, then contractors bid on it.
• Strengths: clear scope, competitive pricing, and strong owner control of design.
• Watch for: a longer overall schedule, and disputes if design gaps surface during construction.

2. Design-and-build

• How it works: one party takes responsibility for design and construction.
• Strengths: a single point of responsibility, faster delivery, and earlier cost certainty.
• Watch for: less owner control of design detail, and the need for a very clear owner's brief and performance requirements.

3. Construction management

• How it works: a construction manager advises during design and manages packages of work, often with trade contractors.
• Strengths: early buildability input, flexibility to start early, and transparency of cost.
• Watch for: price certainty comes later, and the owner needs strong governance.

Five questions to guide the choice

1. How firm is the scope today? Firm scope favors traditional or design-and-build.
2. How important is speed to revenue? Overlapping design and construction can save time, at some cost in certainty.
3. How much design control do you want? More control usually means more owner involvement.
4. How much risk do you want to transfer? And can the market price that risk fairly?
5. Can you manage the approach? Some approaches demand strong in-house governance.

Two practical notes

• Whatever the approach, approvals, utilities, and land access must be ready first. A contract will not fix an unready project.
• Government projects follow procurement rules (RA 9184 and its implementing rules), which can limit the choices available.

Contract basics worth getting right

• A clear scope, with exclusions stated and interface responsibilities defined.
• A payment basis that matches the risk you intend to transfer.
• A realistic programme tied to permit dependencies.
• A change-control process, so variations are priced and approved before work proceeds.

The best delivery approach on paper still depends on clear contracts and disciplined management in practice.

Matching the approach to the project

A well-defined facility with a stable scope often suits traditional or design-and-build delivery. A complex, phased development with evolving needs may benefit from construction management. Where speed is critical and the owner can write a clear brief, design-and-build can shorten the path. The right answer depends on your project, not on a rule.

An independent adviser can help compare options against your risk appetite and schedule before you commit.

This guide is general and does not replace legal, environmental, or permitting advice. Requirements vary by LGU, agency, and project type, so verify current requirements before relying on them.

Keep reading

A feasibility study is a decision tool, not a sales brochure. It should show whether a project is commercially, technically, environmentally, socially, and regulatorily viable, and whether it can be located, serviced, drained, accessed, approved, phased, funded, and built without unacceptable risk.

Use these ten questions to test any study, including one you did not commission.

1. What decision is this study meant to support? Look for a clear proceed, revise, defer, or stop recommendation.
2. Which assumptions drive the answer? Are land cost, price, absorption, and phasing stated and sourced?
3. Has demand been tested? Check market analysis, positioning, pricing, and the product mix.
4. Are all costs included? Land, development, professional fees, permits, contingency, holding costs, and utility or off-site works.
5. Is the technical case real? Buildable area, access, grading concept, drainage and outfall, and utility serviceability.
6. Has the ground been investigated? Look for survey and geotechnical data, or a clear note on what is assumed.
7. What is the approval pathway? Zoning, environmental clearance (ECC or CNC), conversion if applicable, and development and building permits, with realistic durations.
8. What are the social and environmental risks? Informal occupancy, consultation, protected areas, and mitigation.
9. What happens if things go wrong? Look for sensitivity or scenario analysis on cost, price, and schedule.
10. Who prepared it, and how independent are they? Are limitations and sign-offs stated?

Red flags

• A single scenario with no sensitivity analysis.
• "Assumed" appearing next to flood, utilities, or approvals.
• Costs that omit off-site works, contingency, or holding costs.
• Approval timelines that look like best-case hopes.

How to use the answers

Mark each question as satisfied, partly satisfied, or open. Open items become your next studies. Fatal items may be reasons to stop. Cost-sensitive items need allowances before you commit. A good study makes its own weak points easy to find.

What to do when the study is thin

Not every study will be strong. If key answers are missing, ask the author to state what they assumed and what they did not test. Then decide which gaps are cheap to close, such as a survey or a utility inquiry, and which could change the answer, such as an outfall or an approval. Close the second kind first.

Sensitivity checks worth requesting

• Land price and total cost 10 percent higher.
• Selling price or rental income lower than planned.
• Approvals taking longer than expected.
• Absorption slower than planned.

Remember, too, that a feasibility study answers a question at a moment in time. Prices, approvals, and site knowledge change, so revisit the key assumptions at each gate and update the study when something material moves.

We can review a study independently and summarize the findings as decision points for your board or investors.

This guide is general and does not replace legal, environmental, or permitting advice. Requirements vary by LGU, agency, and project type, so verify current requirements before relying on them.

Keep reading

The first 90 days of a project rarely feel urgent. Nothing is being built yet. But this is when the controls are set that keep cost, schedule, quality, and approvals visible. Get them right early and the rest of the project runs on a firmer footing.

Days 1 to 30: Set the foundations

• Confirm objectives, decision rights, and who can approve scope, cost, and schedule changes.
• Open five registers: risks, assumptions, decisions, actions, and submissions or agency comments. Give every entry an owner and a due date.
• Start a live permit matrix showing each approval, its prerequisites, and its target date.
• Define a basis of design so key criteria are written down and agreed.
• Agree on consultant scopes and briefs. See our guide on briefing consultants.

Days 31 to 60: Test and verify

• Hold pre-application meetings with the LGU and other agencies, and record the outcomes.
• Require interim findings from surveys and investigations, and act on fatal or cost-sensitive items.
• Run the first risk review and assign mitigation actions with triggers.
• Set a cost baseline and a schedule linked to permit dependencies.

Days 61 to 90: Gate and prepare

• Hold the first formal integration gate: proceed, revise, defer, or stop.
• Review procurement strategy and contract packaging.
• Confirm reporting: a short, regular report on progress, risks, decisions, and approvals.
• Plan the construction readiness checklist, so land access, utilities, approvals, and environmental controls are checked before mobilization.

Principles to keep

• Close risks with evidence, not assumptions.
• Escalate anything that touches the critical path, safety, approvals, or cost.
• Keep technical, regulatory, and commercial workstreams moving in parallel.
• Update registers after major studies, agency meetings, and cost reviews.

A sample one-page report

• Progress: what was completed since the last report.
• Top risks: the five that matter, with owners and next actions.
• Decisions needed: what is waiting on whom, and by when.
• Approvals status: submitted, in review, or approved, with conditions.
• Cost and schedule: movement against the baseline, and why.

Common pitfalls

• Starting design before key approvals are mapped.
• Keeping registers that nobody updates.
• Treating the first gate as a formality.

Roles to name early

• Project sponsor: owns the objective and the funding.
• Project director or manager: owns delivery and reporting.
• Permitting lead: owns the permit matrix and agency relationships.
• Design manager: owns the basis of design and consultant coordination.
• Commercial lead: owns cost, contracts, and procurement.

When everyone knows who owns what, issues move faster and fewer fall through the gaps.

Close the 90 days with a short review: what worked, what did not, and what to adjust before the next phase begins.

If you would like help setting up governance or a project health check, we are glad to talk.

This guide is general and does not replace legal, environmental, or permitting advice. Requirements vary by LGU, agency, and project type, so verify current requirements before relying on them.

Keep reading

A deposit feels small next to the cost of a development. But once it is paid, the seller has leverage and you have momentum, and both work against careful judgment. The cheapest time to find a problem is before the deposit, and a short, structured set of questions will surface most of them.

How the scoring works

• 2: clear and evidenced. You hold the document or written confirmation, not just an assurance.
• 1: needs work, but there is a credible path to resolve it and you know who will do it.
• 0: blocking. It stops the project unless something major changes.

The ten points

• 1. Legal control and clean title (gatekeeper): Certified true copy of the title, tax declaration, and proof of authority of everyone who must sign.
• 2. Boundary and survey match: A relocation survey by a licensed geodetic engineer, compared with the title.
• 3. Zoning and land-use pathway (gatekeeper): Written zoning certification or LGU advice, not verbal assurances.
• 4. Land status and conversion (gatekeeper): Land classification and status evidence; watch for agricultural classification or agrarian reform origins.
• 5. Legal and physical access (gatekeeper): A documented right-of-way and a road that can carry construction trucks.
• 6. Flood and geohazard exposure: Public hazard maps, neighbours' accounts, and high-water marks.
• 7. Drainage outfall (gatekeeper): A drainage sketch and photos showing where the water goes, and that you may send it there.
• 8. Utility serviceability: Written availability letters for power, water, and wastewater, with timing.
• 9. Environmental and social triggers: Screening advice, a list of occupants, and barangay and neighbour notes.
• 10. Economics and timeline: Cost per usable square metre, monthly holding cost, and a simple downside test.

For each point the checklist also lists the question to ask, the evidence to collect, and the red flags to watch for, with a scoring box for your own honest answer.

What your score means

• 17 to 20: proceed to detailed due diligence and feasibility, with open items assigned to owners.
• 12 to 16: do not buy outright. Negotiate conditions, a longer due diligence period, or a lower price tied to the open items.
• 0 to 11, or any gatekeeper at 0: defer or stop, unless there is a clear path to resolve the blocker.

General educational guidance only. It is not legal, financial or engineering advice for any specific property. Requirements vary by locality and change over time; confirm current requirements with the relevant agencies and engage qualified professionals before committing money.

Keep reading